Editorial policy and review

Editorial рolicy

Scientific-methodical journal "New pedagogical thought" practices open access policy for users. Based on the principles of free flow and exchange of scientific information. The content of the collection is in free access for internet users. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or make reference to the full text of articles in this journal without no permission from the publisher or author. The above definition corresponds BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative) on open access. 
Editorial policy
The editorial board of the scientific journal follow to ethical standards adopted by the international scientific community, based on the recommendations of the Committee on Publishing Ethics, also on the experience of reputable international journals and publishing houses.

The editorial policy of the journal based on the following principles:

  • objectivity and impartiality in the selection of articles;
  • keeping all structural components of the article;
  • "Blind" review articles;
  • copyright compliance;
  • keeping journal output schedule.

Editorial board collection condemned manifestations of plagiarism in academic papers and take steps to prevent it.

Reviewing

The purpose of the review is to improve the quality of materials research articles published in scientific collections. Reviewing articles by members of the editorial board, which determines compliance material to the subject of the journal, and also defines the scientific value of the original author. Editorial board appoints reviewers - independent experts who are closest to the subject of scientific specialization. Review procedure is anonymous for reviewer and authors. Сarried out by two independent reviewers (double "blind" peer review).
Articles reviewed by the editorial board of the journal, and if it is necessary editing send to author (co-authors) for revision. Editorial board inform author (co-authors) its decision to acceptte article for the publication, revision or rejection within 30 calendar days from the moment of relevant decision. Decisison of Editorial Board for revision of the article does not mean that the article is accepted for publication.
Articles sended for review, is regarded as a confidential document that can not be transferred for review or discussion with third persons, which do not have that authority from the editorial board.
External review carried out by qualified professionals with scientific papers on issues of article. The external reviewer is chosen by considering of its consent.
Editorial board have the exclusive right to reject articles aimed at the journal for its publication. The decision of the editorial board is final. Improved option granted to the editor with the original version. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten articles and if is necessary to subject them to a literary edition.
Reviewing carried out by following positions:
  • compliance article to the journals thematic focus and specialization;
  • compliance article content with specified title;
  • relevant structural components of the article;
  • noriginality of the article.

All materials submitted for publication in the journal "New pedagogical thought" tested by the software "Antiplagiat" to determine level of copyright uniqueness. In case of plagiarism, article will be rejected or sent back for revision, if is necessary specify the source or citation.